by: menosketiago
posted: March 25, 2008

I think you are mixing real liberties like gay rights and uncensored information with the right to kill yourself and to kill others and that’s not liberty at all.

Tobacco ban refers to the liberty of your fellow humans not to inhale the chemicals you want to smoke. Talking on cell reduces driver attention and maximizes the risk of accidents, wich most of the times result on collateral victims. These are not liberties, there are “stupidties”, mate

The paradox of the “land of the free” that I agree to

by: chantelle
posted: March 26, 2008

Yeah, mixed messages man. Trans Fat foods?… well if you want more processed crap…

by: SoJerZ
posted: March 26, 2008

I’m not saying Trans-fat foods are a good thing.. I’m saying it should be a persons choice… thats liberty.

by: SoJerZ
posted: March 26, 2008

21% of the country smokes… I agree with what you said meno but I believe the establishment should have the choice of whether or not smoking is allowed inside. That way people can choose if they want to go inside a smoking or non-smoking establishment.. thats liberty.

by: SoJerZ
posted: March 26, 2008

This isn’t a mixed message.. I’m not saying don’t smoke cigarettes but inhale nicotine.. that’s a mixed message. It is simply a list of things banned or illegal or about to be banned.. they are all different things. Should I make a design with the same message repeated over and over? Offensive books banned, Offensive material banned, offensive literature banned, etc. They are all the same thing.

by: al-Hamad
posted: March 27, 2008

I see it as a mixed message too. Some things are banned because they physically harm others - that makes good sense to everyone but right-wing libertarians. Banning smoking indoors protects the health of non-smokers, accepting same-sex marriage doesn’t hurt other marriages. Banning talking on a cell phone while driving means fewer accidents - it protects other drivers from the jerk on the cell. But unless the book incites people to violence, then banning a book just stops communication - it doesn’t do anything but block freedom.

by: DzynGurl
posted: March 29, 2008

Yeah, if we hadn’t banned DDT and Asbestos in the US, our freedom-loving corporations would still be gladly selling it to anyone who would buy… they still do in the 3rd world.

by: addsenior
posted: April 02, 2008

I like the typographic concept but i think a bespoke typeface would work more to your advantage instead of using a standard downloaded display font, makes things look a bit monotonous

by: salsal
posted: April 23, 2008

You seem to confuse state laws with American laws. Besides, some of the issues on the flag infringe on other people’s rights, like the right to breathe clean air and a health department that promotes health.

by: lydia-distracted
posted: September 21, 2008

Yeah and there also not free to hit and run. oh damn.